Topics

$7 fig trees for spring/summer delivery, around 150+ varieties

I asked for a refund last night. I'll keep you guys updated if he follows through with it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by figherder


He's greedy for charging 7 bucks for very hard to get varieties?  By all means have your friends go on ebay and buy the black madeira or Ponte tresa there. If they get one for under 100 bucks they are doing well. You ask why people aren't pissed like you? Because in the fig community we know what it takes to make things happen and also know what a deal we are getting for 7 bucks for some of these varieties.


You must be living in a fantasy world. $7 deal is only a deal when the blooming trees are delivered!. Of course $7 is not a great deal of money if you order one or two trees , not for 50 or 100 trees. And you are saying some of those hard to get varieties are great for $7, well by the time you get your PONTE TRESA it will be only worth $7 or even less (if he deliver that is). Some of these hard to get as you say varieties  are selling for $5 or even less in asian countries and I know its not the case here in the US but still cuttings grow on trees and by now most of the US collectors took the advantage of WillC, Figaholics and Wagner Farms sales. Now I don't think you really understand the meaning of friendship, I will certainly do anything for my buddies. I said some of them ain't bothered simply because they were smaller orders and we only came across this forum recently. Are you reading my previous posts??.. If we wanted a refund then we would've done it already and by the way James isin't refunding no more as per some posts here. And FYI I don't wish James success at all because it ain't gonna happen LOL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by figherder
.


And do you know why i hurt your feelings?. Its because you and most of you lot know that I'm telling the truth and because you lot still hope for a miracle to happen and truth hurts hence I'm a TROLL!. Positive thinking is good to a certain extent but if you are blind to see the truth then you are telling yourself to believe the lie. Hard to get varieties are hard to get for a reason, you'll get it only by paying the price or by making good friends. If $7 trees are finally delivered in 2019 spring then its not a deal anymore, you just wasted 3 years of your life waiting for a tree LOL.

You didn't hurt my feeling, I just have no clue why you are here. What people pay and choose to wait for is their business. In full disclosure I chose not to wait and have gone off and purchased from other sources. I asked for a refund and got it the next day.
Now since you have no orders and your friends don't really care about the issue you really have no business here so your only intention is to stir up stuff. That makes you a troll.

Quote:
Originally Posted by figherder
I just have no clue why you are here..


Yawn! Keep thinking 

Quote:
Originally Posted by FigPolice


Yawn! Keep thinking 
Either another fig grower or from the other forum.
either way, it is a clear sabotage.
I got my answer, thank you.

Quote:
Takes less than 24 hrs to have your money back


Today marks one week since I requested my refund.  No communication from James.  I'm assuming he's still completely overloaded and has little time to respond to email, but the "24 hour" refund time doesn't appear to be valid at the moment.

As I said earlier, I would post an update on my refund request, and this is it.

For the record, I also sent a "REFUND" private message on this forum 48 hours ago--also no communication yet.  My original email was also entitled "REFUND".  I still expect my refund, but I'll post another update in a few days either way.

I had requested refund with "REFUND" subject email to James 2days ago.
I will post an update when I receive the refund.

OT Post and I hope that I will be forgiven but....

I posted my return and received my refund request in near record time.... from the Internal Revenue Service.... have to say they have gotten very efficient in processing return requests and sending out refunds....

Quote:
Originally Posted by smatthew


Let's clear this up. You are a wealthy old man, right? Hopping around the globe. Married to a young Thai wife, whom you don't even live with, and doesn't travel with you? You live in different parts of the world, have separate bank accounts, but she knows she can come crying to you when she has problems.  Why isn't she on this messageboard?


She is not on the board because of the 4 languages she speaks, English rates at the bottom. Your subtle jibes insults, and rudeness she just would not understand.

"Young Thai wife" that was 20 years ago, both of us are getting older.

You seem critical of our life style....however personal satisfaction come best from your own accomplishments, or from the success of your spouse??

I have been very successful at times in my life, other time dead broke. When she started ordering figs last year, she worked and saved for 3 months to have the $4170.00 to order those figs.

When last week she asked for my help, I started a search found this thread, and came to understand that James Sperman is smoke and mirrors. He has yet to deliver his 1st fig cutting. Yet he continues to take money and make promises.

If James refunds my wife's money, then peace be upon him, and I will let the rest of you fight your own fights, and I will never post here again. If he chooses to believe his is safe because the web will shield him he might well be shocked.


I have had significant problems with this seller.

I have contacted James over the course of 3 months looking for a refund due to his failure to deliver.  He had not responded back to 4 emails.  I called him at his private number which I found online through the Kansas Department of Agriculture.  He basically told me to F-off that he's too busy to respond to people.  he went on a rant that he has over 5,000 customers and he broke his toe.  He went on to explain to me that as of the day that I called, he had 485 emails that day alone, and it's bothersome to answer emails when he could be in the greenhouse working.

After further research I have found numerous people that have been waiting for months and have not been able to get a refund for both his fig tree's and the fish he sells.

He just provides excuse after excuse.  If he was at least NOT rude, his story would have been a little believable.  It just sounds like a business that he put too much money into and can't deliver.

Buyer beware!

Quote:
Originally Posted by adipose


I am just a guy commenting on a thread on the internet. I don't think I am preventing any investigations by stating my opinion. There may be willful raud, but I cannot know that. You seem to suggest the only way to find out if it's fraud is to conclude that in advance--a logical fallacy.

Fraud and a Ponzi scheme are not necessarily the same. I mostly object to that term only because I don't find that it matches the circumstances. I never expected to profit or was misled about potential profits... I just expected to get my order or lose my money. If James never intended to ship my trees then that would be fraud. I don't think that was the intention but that's just my opinion. And my opinion is not stopping anyone from pursuing legal remedies.


You mean like paying $7 for a tree with a real market value of around $150?  We all have to be absolutely daft to think he hasn't done that several times over using OUR money at this point.  I believe it might have even you who said he's built up an nice inventory.  




Quote:
Originally Posted by TheASTrader


You mean like paying $7 for a tree with a real market value of around $150?  We all have to be absolutely daft to think he hasn't done that several times over using OUR money at this point.  I believe it might have even you who said he's built up an nice inventory.  


Well, yes, you are right that the price was below cost.  In some cases, way below, in other cases, not much.  I did mention that earlier in the thread when talking about Ponzi schemes, so I'm not ignorant of the comparison.  Accusing him of selling the trees at a higher cost instead of delivering the $7 trees is interesting, but is more like breach of contract than a Ponzi scheme.

It's an interesting situation.  The price is so low that some people think he's basically giving them away, so no one has any right to complain.  But if nothing is ever delivered, then that money will add up to a lot, even at $7/tree (btw the second round of trees was priced much higher, some at $20 and maybe more if I recall--though still low).

The easiest term for that, if it was intentional, would be a simple scam: he took money with no intention of delivering.  If it was unintentional, would be poor business management with a possible case of fraud as things spiraled down.  But for it to be a Ponzi scheme, you know, he'd have to be delivering things to encourage future investment.

The idea with a Ponzi scheme is to create trust by actually delivering to the early investors.  If anything, this is a reverse Ponzi scheme!

Quote:
Originally Posted by adipose


Well, yes, you are right that the price was below cost.  In some cases, way below, in other cases, not much.  I did mention that earlier in the thread when talking about Ponzi schemes, so I'm not ignorant of the comparison.  Accusing him of selling the trees at a higher cost instead of delivering the $7 trees is interesting, but is more like breach of contract than a Ponzi scheme.

It's an interesting situation.  The price is so low that some people think he's basically giving them away, so no one has any right to complain.  But if nothing is ever delivered, then that money will add up to a lot, even at $7/tree (btw the second round of trees was priced much higher, some at $20 and maybe more if I recall--though still low).

The easiest term for that, if it was intentional, would be a simple scam: he took money with no intention of delivering.  If it was unintentional, would be poor business management with a possible case of fraud as things spiraled down.  But for it to be a Ponzi scheme, you know, he'd have to be delivering things to encourage future investment.

The idea with a Ponzi scheme is to create trust by actually delivering to the early investors.  If anything, this is a reverse Ponzi scheme!


Again, further obfuscation and revisionism of your definition.  By your parameters, you will concede that it is a Ponzi Scheme once we get confirmation of the first order being delivered.

No, not really.  I did say earlier in the thread it is ironic that delivering the trees could make it closer to a Ponzi scheme.  But, I still maintain that the key component of encouraging future investment by creating the appearance of high rate of return, accomplished by satisfying initial investors, is not present here.  The fact that it's an order, not an investment, is also problematic for the definition, imo.

I think I've been real about the problems in this venture throughout the thread.  I've questioned how realistic it is; I've suggested James has already run out of money from the 2016 orders, meaning he's getting the money somewhere else (could be his pocket).  I've stated that if the money for the 2017 orders is being used to fund the initial trees that that borders on being a Ponzi scheme.

You, on the other hand, will apparently only be happy with one conclusion.  Something can be bad or wrong without it being a Ponzi scheme.  But you seem determined to call it that.  Ok, you call it what you like.  Discussion with you appears to be fruitless.

To all the members here that has blasted James,cussed him,called him a crook,doing a Ponzi Scheme, use your common sense, on just one thing: What do you think he is going to do with  1,000's of Trees? Y'all Get Real!

I have not seen a thousand trees,all I have seen is about 100 floating around in plastic kiddie pools and for all I know they could be brown turkeys.Has anyone got their order yet? Not me and I was one of the first to place one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankallen
To all the members here that has blasted James,cussed him,called him a crook,doing a Ponzi Scheme, use your common sense, on just one thing: What do you think he is going to do with  1,000's of Trees? Y'all Get Real!

That was actually pretty funny Frank

I was thinking the same thing - both what would he do with the trees and are there as many as he tells us. I'm still very conflicted but highly annoyed in the lack of updates and not a single report of a delivery made.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankallen
To all the members here that has blasted James,cussed him,called him a crook,doing a Ponzi Scheme, use your common sense, on just one thing: What do you think he is going to do with  1,000's of Trees? Y'all Get Real!



Yeah!!!!!

What to do with all these trees?

Oh, I don't know, maybe sell them.  If I had all those trees and did not have any of my money in them, I could probably come up with some idea of how to turn them into money, especially if I were as smart as James.  If he sold them all as unknowns he would have some major cash, enough to go someplace warmer and start over again, there are certainly enough supporters to do it again.

I would give him $5 each for all of them, even un-tagged/labeled

Lets make a deal, LOL

Some famous person once said "I don't make this stuff up, I just write it down and repeat it"  Henry Cho, comedian, I think

And what would you do with them? Spend all day every day working on them like he is? I could start a thousand more trees tomorrow but all I would have is an extra thousand trees I don't need and can't sell and no time for anything else. I'd rather keep my trees intact and enjoy an earlier harvest.

Quote:
Originally Posted by adipose
No, not really.  I did say earlier in the thread it is ironic that delivering the trees could make it closer to a Ponzi scheme.  But, I still maintain that the key component of encouraging future investment by creating the appearance of high rate of return, accomplished by satisfying initial investors, is not present here.  The fact that it's an order, not an investment, is also problematic for the definition, imo.

I think I've been real about the problems in this venture throughout the thread.  I've questioned how realistic it is; I've suggested James has already run out of money from the 2016 orders, meaning he's getting the money somewhere else (could be his pocket).  I've stated that if the money for the 2017 orders is being used to fund the initial trees that that borders on being a Ponzi scheme.

You, on the other hand, will apparently only be happy with one conclusion.  Something can be bad or wrong without it being a Ponzi scheme.  But you seem determined to call it that.  Ok, you call it what you like.  Discussion with you appears to be fruitless.




Actually, my initial post merely said this is looking more and more like a Ponzi Scheme.  Nothing definitive about that at all.  The structure is there for all to see, however.  [We're not profiting...he hasn't delivered yet, therefore... he hasn't benefited as an operator...]  I have found your false deductions really amusing.  :)

But, I still maintain that the key component of encouraging future investment by creating the appearance of high rate of return, accomplished by satisfying initial investors, is not present here.

Like keeping up the advertisement of the $7 tree?  Like continuing to take orders??  Like update pictures showing us close ups of labeled trees of the most sought after varieties with market values well over $200 each, enticing those of us deep in Fig Fever with the prospect of the $7 Black Madeira?    

What you and several others here fail at are:

1) Recognizing that an asset need not simply be in the form of currency.
2) Connecting painfully obvious, right in front of your face, committed right in the open, dots.
3) Forgetting the basics (the parameters of the initial post).

Does anyone know how hot a 7 ft hoop tunnel or rows and rows of them get when the heat and humidity arrive all of a sudden and before you have the opportunity to tear down the poly? Then again, if you can tear down the poly quickly enough all your thousands of young trees grown in these 7ft hoop tunnels should do just fine in the 90 degree sun although possibly without benefit of prior hardening off.... Then again, perhaps tearing off the poly and replacing it quickly with 40% shade cloth before the plants get severely sunburned can be done very quickly and efficiently when you have the shade cloth on hand and ready to go and sufficient manpower to erect same...

I'm just thinking out loud and hope he is doing a better job of managing his hoop tunnels loaded with thousands of new plants waiting to be shipped than I am doing with my tiny 24x14x7 hoop house loaded with just my small inventory of rooted cuttings and mother plants... My plants got sunburned these last few weeks and my little hoop tunnel has windows and 3 fans blasting when the temp hits 75...

Quote:
Actually, my initial post merely said this is looking more and more like a Ponzi Scheme


So you aren't sure?

Quote:
2) Connecting painfully obvious, right in front of your face, committed right in the open, dots.


But it's obvious?

Load More Posts... 297 remaining topics of 1,422 total
Reply Cancel
Subscribe Share Cancel