I do not think we really need to know from where EL got their Sal's;
most probably from some guy named Sal.
We all know that Sal's (EL) is a unique and a good fig.
I do not remember who and where, but somebody had pointed out the story.
A while back, EL had 2 different mother trees as Sal's and HC. People who
bought figs at that time were able buy the two distinct labeled figs separately.
At some point EL, determined that the two mother tress were the same i.e., HC
(other people, including me, like to differ). So from that point on, people were
getting figs from the two mother trees under one name (HC), and not
knowing what it really was. Depending from where they acquired their second
fig, some people swear that they are the same, while others differ, a 50-50 chance.
For example, I bought my HC from EL in 2002 (at that time I did not see
a Sal in their catalog). Later, I acquired a Sal which could be back-traced to
Gene, who apparently bought it as a Sal from EL, either earlier or by calling
(yes sometimes not all their figs are listed). My HC (EL) is different from Sal (EL),
so my HC must have been true (and not a Sal).
To make things slightly more worse, I also acquired an HC back-traced from
Harrison (via Herman), which I call HC(H) and it is slightly different from HC(EL).
Hope that this clears some things for you and not make you scratch your head even more..
.
George (NJ).