I think it is somewhat absurd to seem to imply the only honest people in the fig world are "members in good standing" or that we should interrogate a neophyte seller with 20 questions to justify a $15 purchase. BTW, where is the "good standing" and "high quality fig" lists posted and what group makes that determination? I tried the search function.
I have and will continue to buy figs from various sources that do not conform to some arbitrary list of rules to simply sell common fig cuttings. If you are looking for expensive cuttings or cannot afford the possible loss of $15-$20 then I would say these may be good rules to follow. But nobody is getting rich by selling small amounts of common fig cuttings on Ebay unless they are offering many, many types from an apartment in New Jersey.
To expect every seller to take pics of the tree in season with figs and leaf pics along with a ripe fig pic then resize and post them with a watermark just to sell 40 cutting from the Celeste in their backyard for $100 or less is out of touch with the reality of selling on Ebay. Maybe if you are selling expensive cuttings you could justify this extreme silliness. Many members of this Forum cannot take, resize and post pics and the same with some Ebay sellers. The worst of the absurdity is to come down on a fellow member because he did not follow these goofy "rules", does he lose his "good standing" because he failed to take anual pics of all 350 fig trees, fruits and leaves? I'm sorry, I did not predict the drought last year in the S.E., I guess I can't sell cuttings as my only pics are of dry figs on the ground. I guess I "can't grow figs" either as they did not produce, I promise to try not to cause a drought this year and to take pics of everything in case I trim a tree and want to sell the cuttings on Ebay. We have members saying to only buy from members and we have other members claiming some members are scammers.
Yes, I have been "scammed" (not get the fig type I purchased), but I refuse to hold all non "members in good standing" sellers as bad actors. I have also been "scammed" by my local garden center, Lowes, Home Depot, Wal-mart, a Forum member and some nationally known internet businesses. I do not believe ANY of them did this to steal my money. Many of those from big stores were tagged with pics of trees and fruit that was incorrect. Pics do not determine what you get shipped or buy in any way, shape or form from a scammer or legit supplier. The hard truth of figs and other plants is that you don't always get what you think you are buying, mostly caused by human error, NOT intentional scams.
This is my opinion and does not mean it is "right" for anyone but me, and maybe the hundreds of Ebay and member sellers that are trying to make an honest buck to support a hobby. I sincerely hope if someone is trying to supplement their income on Ebay and fail to adhere to "Herman's" rules they do not lose sales because of this silliness. I'm curious, does anyone know if there was a burning bush involved in "Herman's" rules?