Oh and the family of Brown Turkey, which apparently is very closely related to Black Jack, Walker, Texas Blue Giant, and some others. I own TBG and I can safely say that it's BT's sibling. They're not the same thing but you really don't need to own both.
But on that note, I don't know much about the different "types" of Brown Turkey, like the "Californian", "Southern", - you got the "English" one there. Maybe someone with more info can clear that up. In the meantime: http://www.walterreeves.com/food-gardening/rays-givans-fig-page-dark-fig-varieties/ At the end of each description, he lists some synonyms.
Also, in your chart's "English BT" category, you've got Nordland. I've been under the impression that Nordland is Longue d'Août. http://www.ourfigs.com/forum/figs-home/3108-longue-d-aout
Of course, there's also this: http://www.ourfigs.com/forum/figs-home/33227-are-these-two-figs-the-same
Lastly, I'm not sure if you've seen this but https://figs4funforum.websitetoolbox.com/post/synonyms-to-fig-varieties-6730478
So you can definitely see some discrepancies throughout all of this but w/e. Just reading through this, some of these threads kind of get into territory of comparing Gala apples to Pink Lady - not a huge difference - and I think a broad, flexible, forgiving classification can be appropriate. When along come wildly distinctive varieties like Macintosh and Granny Smith and in comparison to the two aforementioned cultivars, the opinion that the Pink Lady is slightly more "floral" than its near identical counterpart might ought to get relegated a bit. Idk how anyone else feels but, imo, those distinctions, while important, feel more like footnotes. Not a criticism of your work, just thinking out loud.