HI,
with all the controversy over figs, and fig varieties and numerous names and misnamed figs, I just wanted to get feed back on the two figs which I have started to grow this year. 1 is supposed to be Natalina, 2 is supposed  to be Bifara. Does this seem correct to those in the know? I only have the leaves to go by for now, perhaps next year I will have figs as well. The 'Bifara' is a very bushy plant, with branches every inch or two from main stem , as well the leaves are anywhere from single lobed to five lobed.

thanks
Grant

I also thought it might be a useful to have an identification thread with pictures of various varieties leaves, figs, and growth habit.

pictures did not load,
have to get htem down to less than 1 megabite

>>>I also thought it might be a useful to have an identification thread with pictures of various varieties leaves, figs, and growth habit.

You must be either kidding or naive...
check this out [and as Jon says; enjoy]:
http://figs4fun.com/Varieties.html

THANKS.
I did not see that on the site before.

But as far as the two I have there are lots of pictures of figs for the bifara, nothing for the leaves, nothing on the overall shape of the plant

I guess I'll have to take pix of Bifara leaves.