It's funny that when you haven't been bit by the "fig virus" you don't notice somethings that are obvious to the fig enthusiast.
I inherited a few fig trees (40 years + trees) that to me seemed identical. Even the figs they produce where, apparently, similar.
When i started collecting figs i used one of these "repeated" old trees as a grafting source. I did an agressive pruning and grafted several new varieties on the remaining branches while removing all the suckers that sprouted so they couldn't compete with my new grafts.
One of these suckers was left untouched and has a few figs, so i left it alone.
This week i collected some mature figs from this sucker and was able to compare them to my Preto de Torres Novas. To my surprise they are not identical. I always thought they where the same fig, minus some small differences, mainly in size, that i thought were caused by location, soil or other factors. But the flavor and overall interiors of both figs are quite different. Even the leaves are different - which now is clearly obvious but i had never noticed.
So this is a different variety that i am naming Preto de Torres Novas 2 because of the exterior similarity.
Some photos of the "old" Preto de Torres Novas.The last photos are from some still unripe figs this year, but the flavor is still very good.
The first photos are from last year's crop. If we don't use a net the birds eat all the ripe figs leaving none!And this year the net is still not in use so i can't find a single ripe fig that isn't almost fully eaten.
This fig is very good with a very complex flavor, even when still not quite ripe. When fully matured is excellent, with some seed crunch and hints of cinnamon from the skin and others subtle flavors i can't pinpoint.
None of these figs needs the wasp and none was pollinated. The seeds are not viable, they all float.