I have been thinking. Of course that is not proof of anything, but I want to run this past you all. There are two principles here that I've seen discussed.
The first is potting up; another post asks if a rooted cutting may be immediately moved to a large pot. Why not? We put small plants in the ground, MUCH larger than a pot.
The second is the idea that we must not allow perched water. Now, I will agree that roots do not do well in saturated soil, but how about this:
I have a "Grow Box" purchased for tomatoes. It is essentially a pot with a couple of soil-filled tubes that extend into a water reservoir below. The tomatoes are planted in the top pot and the soil-filled tubes wick water upward into the root zone. In fact, the tomatoes send roots all the way down into the water. I do not water the tomatoes, I only add water to the reservoir below.
Suppose that we made such a pot for figs? My idea is to place a stand in a barrell cut down to about fourteen inches. I will then cut a six inch hole in the bottom of a large pot, place a six inch perforated tube in that hole, set the whole thing on the stand in the barrell and fill the pot and tube with potting mix. A rooted fig will then be planted in the pot. I will then have what amounts to a "grow box" for a fig. This seems to me to be a logical extension of the "pot in pot" method.
Any comments? Has anyone done this? Any suggestions or alterations? I can see at least one negative; the plant will be hard to move.
Ox