I'm back.
Yesterday, for the very first time, ever, I had the pleasurable occasion to taste a ripe Pawpaw. It was a delicious, startling, flavor blend of mango, pineapple, and banana with the texture of an avocado, or, a custardy flan.
Now, I'm sorry that I did not plant a few of these trees years ago, and that I don't have the space to plant them. Nothing comes close to the flavor of this fruit. It amazes me that these trees are not sold in local nurseries, and that they are not more common. In all my years of schlepping around garden centers, I have never seen any of these trees for sale. Some of our forum posters have hinted at a few of the demerits of Pawpaw trees that might limit the commercial availability, but growing peaches and apples can be a PITA too! These kind of fruit trees are prime targets for all kinds of diseases, rusts, blights, bugs...and, whatever, and almost always produce so-so fruit.
I am really disappointed to realize that these trees do will not do well growing in a large tub like a 55 gallon barrel, and that at least two or more different varieties are really needed to ensure the setting of fruit. I also don't relish the idea of having to wait for a few years for the big payoff.
I wonder: If two or more varieties are needed for better pollination, and to increase fruit yield, why then are understock-trees not grafted with two or more varieties so that a more salable tree could be pitched by the trade as being more "self-fruitful'? If buds of named varieties are grafted to understock trees, just graft more buds to make a combo-tree....sell it for triple the price. At least the end customer will more than likely, get quicker, and surer, fruiting. I must be missing something.
Frank