These trees just poles straight back up within a season. They're already due a little pruning after this year, but there is no confidence that it would take the hint, and we'd probably be too lazy to prune more than in the fall or winter. We're too lazy, period, not being fig enthusiasts in particular. Not fussy either. The brebas in general have been very good, compared to main season figs (of BT and garden variety Celestes), and they mostly are ready when colored and soft. Over-ripened brebas do not tend to have that incredible fermented vineous taste. The skin just gets tougher, and the flesh gets sweeter, a little, before souring. If I pick juuuuuuuust right, I can get very slight wine notes. I don't find the taste to be very berry-like in any sense other than it's very acid for a fig (which we all LOVE about this fig).
I just find reading this forum kinda fun because it's got all the mysteries and hijinks and history and all the other crap that makes hobbies like puerh tea fun. I also like to think about fig genetics. In a sense, virtually all of the most dominant fig varieties in terms of taste are a hundred or more years old, older than many heirloom apples. Mission NL is still da man, despite future years of breeding efforts. The vast majority of apple varieties that were around when Mission figs were introduced into Califonia, let alone bred, are archaic and long superceded. Cox Orange Pippin, for example, was bred in 1825. Older, not very useful delicious apples like Ashmead's Kernel were developed in the late 18th century. Great pears like Comice or D'Anjou were found in the mid 19th century. Yet Violette de Bordeaux is from 1680! Still relevant today because, for all of it's age, because this, and closely associated figs have only about 15-20 potentially better non-caprified figs, out of hundreds, including the product of some modern breeding programs. Pomegranates have been around just as long, but there are actual superior tasting modern varieties besides Wonderful! What's the best newer fig? Some flavor of Celeste?
For all of that, we still have trouble identifying varieties because figs can be so different in growth and fruit, depending on the circumstances. I spent alot of my time estimating the differences between my PN and RdB, Vista, VdB, BIschia. RdB grows like what my plant does and fruits about the same time. Vista has the size and shape of the fruit right. BIschia also kinda looks similar, interior pulp-wise. So forth and on. If PN did not have utterly distinctive blend of leaves, I would be tempted to think EL had made an error somewheres way back when. Thus, I wonder just how much figs truly diverge from one another--maybe most figs have a narrow genetic profile, like housecats or humans, and there's only so much that can change. Or maybe figs use more genes or are more plastic in genetic expression, and each branch only has an "idea" of what it means to be "Mission" or "Kathleen Black", and each land a cutting settles in, pushes forth a new coctail of genes, slightly different from the parents, so if a cutting was made from Kathleen Black mother tree in Maryland, and planted in Valdosta, from which a cutting and made and sent to Memphis, from which a cutting is made and sent to Houston, from which a cutting is made and sent to a pot in Denver, from which a cutting is made and sent to Los Vegas, and finally, a cutting arives in the hands of Pitangadiego's grandkids, having spent ten years growing at each previous home. Is that cutting growing in San Diego still Kathleen Black? This is fun, in a window-shopping way.