Hi everyone
I m Godsavesthequeen, newbie from Marseille, France. First, greetings for the new fundation structure, I guess it will be fine for the figs promotion, around the world.
I have an embryo of collection, I am interested in ethnic fig. I have in collection Kalamata, Lesvos, Markopoulou, Yesil Güz, Sari Zeybek, Adriatic, which have been planted in pot. In my orchard, something I failed to give a name. Perhaps "Col de Dame" (?). I will post some pics about it, I would be glad to be helped by taxonomic figs tree specialist.
I am searching and testing convective resistant ecotypes, i.e, some dwarf or adapted fig trees to the convective climates located on rocky, bare, dry places. By now, I am testing dwarf israeli forms...; and iranians (Zagros tyype...). Iranians are for me very closed to F. afghanica. Coming from seedlings, the trees exhibes leaves variance in morphologic expression. Does it exist dimorphism in Zagros fig?
I have another vision relative to taxonomy: Morphologic and moleculars markers are helpfull for taxonomist, but are not enough to approach plant behaviour in environmental conditions. For that, I trust in physiologic approach, respective to the microclimatologic behaviour (Bowen rapport impact on plant...; convective stress, atmospheric deficit vapour pressure and observations of fig trees under respective stress ...)
Recently, I discovered the Hilgardia synthesis, and the famous "three sections" described in it (Archaic types, San pedro types etc...).
I wonder about the genetic determinism of that types? I have a gross question: Does it exist self fecondation in the F. carica ?? What is the impact of caprifig in morphologic and gustative characters?
Best regards
Chriss (=GSTQ)