Topics

Synonyms to fig varieties

aaron can do whatever he wants to do. it's a free country. but for my own purpose, synonyms are useless. they are passing curiosity and do not add any value to growing specific type of figs. and if new members are trying to narrow down what to collect based on synonym, that's a round about way of selecting a tree. if they are trying to collect everything under the sun, i can understand... but why?

if you see a fig you like, you will start search into it. you will find known figs that is being grown by others in this forum or other places. find out true variety, then decide who you want to obtain the tree/cuttings from. i really don't see how synonym will figure into this. i mean.. i want Black Madeira, but it's hard to get right now and i don't have patience to wait for it from USDA/UCD so i'm going to go get Figo Preto? does that make sense to anyone? by the way, BM and FP are different in my location. BM is better specimen for my area. or i want RdB, but no one is willing to share.. so i'll look up synonym and get the closest matching name

it would be fun to see what synonyms are used for some figs, but do they really serve any specific purpose other than to waste my time looking for what Pastiliere might be called other than Pastiliere? by the way, there is no proof that Pastiliere was originated from japan and Hirta du Japon doesn't really fit the fig. 

if anyone's looking for trivial information on synonyms, they are already available. if aaron wants to try to generate complete and comprehensive list, good luck to him. but it's an impossible task. 

going back to BM and FP. per jon and others who found these in west coast, these two are very similar and might even be a same fig grown in different locations and has adapted to that location. growing both side by side in my deck for last two yrs, they are different enough i can't say they are same. BM does better in my area than FP. BM grows slowly, FP grows little better. BM branches out readily while FP grows straight up. i heard someone saying they are same.. would anyone use BM and FP as synonyms before actually growing them in their backyard and watching them grow for themselves? 

jon has 1200 trees or varieties.. don't remember which.. will aaron willing to grow that many and compare every one of the figs? or will he count on other people's words. we already seen enough misinformation on this thread. 

DNA... human and chimp share over 98% of their DNA. however, i'm positive that chimps will be offended if we call them Homo sapien.

Try going to http://wikipedia.org and search for "Chinese Date". You will get to a page with a headline of "Jujube" with a subheading that says "(redirected from Chinese Date)". So, the main article is Jujube, and Chinese date is considered a synonym for the same article. This seems like a good way to store detailed cultivar data and images. The search engine will lead you to a single article whether you enter the primary name or a synonym. So, it seems like both a good way to store/access the info plus relieve some of the difficulty of dealing with synonyms.

There are a few free wiki hosting services out there. I took the liberty of creating a free account just now and created a new empty fig wiki: http://figi.wikidot.com/

Maybe somebody could ask Jon if we could use the data from http://figs4fun.com/Varieties.html as a starting point? Then, you can all contribute to the wiki. If you aren't familiar with how a wiki works, ANYBODY can write a new wiki entry, or edit any page. Obviously there will be some dispute, but that's part of community knowledge.

Well, I created the site, but I don't plan to be the main contributor. If anybody wants to register (free) as a user, I'd be happy to assign you to "editor" status and you can start contributing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgginva

Aaron,
Perhaps you could tell us something about yourself that pertains to experience or knowledge about fig trees (or any group of plants) so we have some idea of your ability to see this project through to fruition. I, and several other members I'm close to, have spent a large amount of time working on a system to help I D fig varieties and have taken many many photographs. Because you are a bit of an unknown it's hard to think about just handing over work we've all been doing over years of keeping figs. This is a very large project and I, for one, have no idea if you are the right person to head it up. You may be. I just don't know so I'm asking you for some sort of bio or resume as pertaining to skills appropriate to this group of skills.
I also have a few questions:
Who will be the judge(s) that will decide if one name is more appropriate then another? How silly does a name have to be before it's removed from a variety and who makes that/those decisions? I see in the lists above definite mistakes. Do you have the knowledge or ability to access the information needed to determine how accurate the different names are?
The info needed to ID and straighten out the mess you say you want to fix is not easily available. As a matter of fact I'm always a bit amazed at how little info exists about figs and all things pertaining to them. It's quite natural to want to fix this mess and I understand and applaud your efforts in trying to find a way to do so.

I don't want to discourage you.
I wish you'd thought about the PM's you sent as first impressions certainly do count.
There is a need for folks with energy to help push the foundation forward, etc.

I do hope the sniping ends and we can have a more mellow conversation about this and I think you need to outline this project in a way that makes it more real and easier to see. It's not always easy to be a leader but if that's what you want you'll need to show me (at least) you understand issues.
However it goes, good luck. It may take a long time and numerous attempts to get the results you want.
Michael, thanks for coming forward to express your concerns. Seems like you also have noticed that the information we are dealing with is complex in a way that to some point one may wander if it is really correct. I just need to know what I am dealing with when it comes to FIG.There is very limited solid foundation with this subject to use as a reference. This is the reason I have started to work on this project.
I, for one, need this, weather with or without your approval. Being from Mediterranean  and growing up in Greek islands it only natural for me to be drawn to figs, since figs are part of Mediterranean stable of diet. I will do my best to organize and dig as far as my abilities allow me to dig into the science of figging ;)
As far as for resume... well, I'll have one handy when I look for a job, LOL,
but just for your curiosity : I have degrees in medical, electric and biological science. (but that doesn't mean a thing when it comes to figging) I have been a bonsai cultivator since 1996 for private collectors and my strongest passion for hobby has always been botany.
Being a leader has never crossed my mind, but thank you for seeing it that way... who knows, maybe one day.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ascpete

Aaron4USA,
There is a much simpler and easier way to proceed with your project.

There are two Databases already constructed and published that have listed Cultivars and Synonyms, I’ve put most of the "common” named varieties into a simple easy to read spreadsheet which I offered to you earlier in this Topic (post # 27). If you wanted to compile a comprehensive list, you could start by adding all the Synonyms listed at UC Davis/GRIN for those Cultivars, then add all the Synonyms listed at Encanto Farms Varieties page  (post # 46) for those cultivars and for all the newly named cultivars. That data could then be proofed for inaccuracies and edited by those interested in your project. Most of the synonyms that are being listed in this topic are already documented in the Encanto Farms Data.

Personally my procedure for researching aliases for a cultivar that I’m interested in acquiring is a simple Google search it will find all the pertinent information available, including this discussion…

Good Luck.

http://figs4fun.com/Varieties.html

http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/tax_site_acc.pl?DAV%20Ficus%20carica

pdf Fig_Cultivar_Grouping_Preliminary_9-29-13.pdf
zip Fig_Cultivar_Grouping_9-29-13.zip

Pete S. please don't for one second think that i have ignored your work, it is in files and THANK YOU so much for offering to use it. That's a lot of work right there ;)

Quote:
Originally Posted by hllyhll

FIG IDENTITY

FIG CULTIVAR NAMES AND TYPES SOMETIMES CONFUSING TO INEXPERIENCED (AND EXPERIENCED) FIG GROWERS

 

What might be useful is a fig wiki. Wikifig. Or Wikicarica.

Wiki-like entries on any or all cultivars and issues of concern...

A fig wiki could go hand-in-hand with the F4F Varieties database and with the F4F Forum and would inevitably both build from them and should contribute back to them.

Might be too expensive and time consuming to set up and keep running -- I don't know.


Tony, this is something to consider. Your input is greatly appreciated.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cyberfarmer


Well, I created the site, but I don't plan to be the main contributor. If anybody wants to register (free) as a user, I'd be happy to assign you to "editor" status and you can start contributing.
Paul, what you have done is great but I don't think it should be open to edit by just any body. That's when all hell would break loose, LOL
Dangerous!
This process has to be very organized, and submitted to be approved by professionals not just in US but even overseas personnel from agriculture industry.

1. Sorry to read a few harsh exchanges here. It has happened here a few times in the past and has left unpleasant memories; Members leaving the forum with various reactions some even deleting their post thus breaking many links in many threads. Harsh words and harsh responses need to be avoided for the benefits of all.
If someone is initiating a new or restarting an old thing and ask for some idea then he is asking for a favour. If interested giving input fine if not then just ignore the thread. However if someone says a few unhappy critical words then it need not be responded in kind but can be reminded in better words.

2. Yes, synonyms; A reliable list will be very helpful to all as already mentioned in this and other threads. It could happily reduce my collection by a good percentage since I do not do much comparison of my plants.
A good list will include not all figs mentioned as synonyms carelessly thrown around as synonyms and objected to by others for good reason as not being synonyms. Therefore the list may need more than two columns. I had started it (but then gave up) with three columns; c1 "fig variety", c2 "Recognized/consensus synonym)", c3"Possible synonym".
(I had removed c4 "Contested synonyms) which synonyms were mentioned in the forums but others contested it.

@Ottawan, your idea is what I am thinking would be very practical one ...I believe in saying.."keep it simple stupid!"
Your comments and input is greatly appreciated.

Aaron,
What type of format will this data take?
How will it be easily accessed?
Thanks

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron4USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyberfarmer


Well, I created the site, but I don't plan to be the main contributor. If anybody wants to register (free) as a user, I'd be happy to assign you to "editor" status and you can start contributing.
Paul, what you have done is great but I don't think it should be open to edit by just any body. That's when all hell would break loose, LOL
Dangerous!
This process has to be very organized, and submitted to be approved by professionals not just in US but even overseas personnel form agriculture industry.


Haven't you ever used wikipedia.org? This is the exact same engine. Wikipedia is open to anybody. It is truly global community knowledge. I think it works pretty darn well and for a lot more than just figs.

Paul: I don't want a format that can be edited by any viewer or user. It has to have a capability of being locked(this part is for Alan). Besides, I was thinking of a simple Spread Sheet type of format (this part goes for Pete's question).
But I'm open to suggestions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron4USA
Paul: I don't want a format that can be edited by any viewer or user. It has to have a capability of being locked(this part is for Alan).


A wiki has multiple security levels. There is an admin, editors, contributors, and regular users. An admin can grant permission to make a user an editor, an admin, etc. If there was a malicious user adding garbage to the wiki, you just remove that user's permissions and undo his changes. It is a format that encourages group contributions, but still allows administrative controls. 

If you say you only want data from "experts", then why are you sending private messages to everyone on this forum to solicit data?

Quote:
Originally Posted by alanmercieca
The thing that makes Synonyms very complicated is that many things can change plant DNA, adapting to a different climate or nutrients can, two injured plants, one growing through the other can change dna, Since I am not an expert in what can change dna I will not try to list anymore, yet you get the point, sometimes it's much easier to tell if plants are/were the same or not. of course testing them in 3 or more climates could help some, and if their dna did not change much if any maybe it would be obvious that they are the same
Alan, to my knowledge, when plant adopts to it's new environment it may change from one shape to another with it's leaves and fruit shape even but I doubt , in fact pretty sure, that nothing at DNA level changes. All the changes ,due to environment, are because of plan't ability to adopt. This is of the POTENTIAL of each plant, the plant is not re-creating itself because that would be Mutation. Even at Mutation the DNA would still be traceable to the original plant state.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cyberfarmer
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron4USA
Paul: I don't want a format that can be edited by any viewer or user. It has to have a capability of being locked(this part is for Alan).


A wiki has multiple security levels. There is an admin, editors, contributors, and regular users. An admin can grant permission to make a user an editor, an admin, etc. If there was a malicious user adding garbage to the wiki, you just remove that user's permissions and undo his changes. It is a format that encourages group contributions, but still allows administrative controls. 

If you say you only want data from "experts", then why are you sending private messages to everyone on this forum to solicit data?
Paul, I have sent PMs for this step only , where any one of us might have some info others lack. The Formatting comes in when we have put most info together. There is plenty of time to decide about formatting.
Besides Spread sheet format, yes, there is wiki, Notebook (MAC/WINDOWS) even eBook and many more choices... we can think about them and the pos & cons... but much later in the process ;)

I haven't read all the posts but I do know Adriatic is not Lampiera. Adriatic is a common fig and Lampiera is a San Pedro. It needs caprification for the main crop.
Long d'out is not figo Preto. Not even close. Please do not associate these names as being equal and expound on the name confusion.

Sue

Quote:
Originally Posted by svanessa

I haven't read all the posts but I do know Adriatic is not Lampiera. Adriatic is a common fig and Lampiera is a San Pedro. It needs caprification for the main crop.
Long d'out is not figo Preto. Not even close. Please do not associate these names as being equal and expound on the name confusion.

Sue

Thank you Sue for your input :)

Even though i had said I did not wish to participate in this thread, which i already have done anyways; I though I would add something that might be useful I hope.  Since the goal is to have synonyms with pictures etc. A dichotomous key may prove very helpful for people as well to distinguish varieties from one another and could add a tool to differentiate between similar cultivars.

An example is:
http://oregonstate.edu/dept/ldplants/di%20key%20ex1.htm

My thought is if all the work will go into this will highlight differences, one of these keys may be easy (although time consuming) to construct and may help people narrow down what their trees are and may help stop wrongly named cultivars or newly named cultivars.

I know  these corrections are being made and we will see them soon.  This is great info to keep things on track.  
My own interest is to have a 50 fig tree orchard this year but I dont want it to be comprised of only 15 or 20  varieties if possible.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hllyhll

FIG IDENTITY

FIG CULTIVAR NAMES AND TYPES SOMETIMES CONFUSING TO INEXPERIENCED (AND EXPERIENCED) FIG GROWERS

The (White) Marseilles figs

Ad Infinitum


What might be useful is a fig wiki. Wikifig. Or Wikicarica.

Wiki-like entries on any or all cultivars and issues of concern...

A fig wiki could go hand-in-hand with the F4F Varieties database and with the F4F Forum and would inevitably both build from them and should contribute back to them.

Might be too expensive and time consuming to set up and keep running -- I don't know.


Tony, when you get the chance please PM me with more details about your wonderful idea.
Thanks

I no longer use PM. Seemed clunky and easy to overlook. You can locate my email address at my profile.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hllyhll
I no longer use PM. Seemed clunky and easy to overlook. You can locate my email address at my profile.

eMail sent

Hi Aaron,

Here in Malaysia, the Red Israel is also known as Khurtmani

Norhayati

Thank you @Norhayati, note taken ;)

Hi Aaron, great post, learning a lot, very helpful, Sergio in NJ.

Load More Posts... 75 remaining topics of 159 total
Reply Cancel
Subscribe Share Cancel