I have some fig but, i didn't know the exact name to this figs..... can you help me brother?

Look at all them figs. I am not one able to help in the id of figs though there are many on here that do it well. I know they will ask for pics of ripe fruit inside and out along with pics of the leaves. These together will aid in the id of your tree.

thank you brother.... next sesion i will post ripe fruit inside and leaves

look this。
http://bbs.shuiguobang.com/thread-110128-1-1.html

shie shie zhao.... :)

FYI Everyone, I just clicked on that last posted link and my computer virus protection went crazy...said there was a trojan coming from the buah-ara blogspot link site.  

I'm not sure if it's anything... I always wonder if my virus software throws up a red flag every now and then just to make me think it's actually doing something...

can't tell if that's VdB. but doesn't look like my VdB. the leaves are different. then again, i heard that some of VdB might have different leaves.

Those look like breba crop figs. Have never seen breba crop like that on VdB.

my norton did not give warnings on that link ?  seems ok now?

I thought you were talking about my link-post，hah！

Did you prune/remove most of the leaves Budi? It looks great.

Here is a picture of a tree that I think is Petite Negri. Do the leaves look like this?

No...., the leaves not same brother

Yes, the ones I see are more like VdB and not rounded. When you get ripe fruit you should show several leaves too and the experts will know.

Thanks for sharing, it is nice to see 2 growing seasons.

Don't look like VdB leaves. It is definitely a dark fig. Hope it is delicious.

Good morning Budi, 

I rechecked the Blogspot site again (which I've done a number of times on 3 different computers) and wanted to share a few things that I found.  I would love to read your blog - and I know that you didn't do anything malicious - but my computers just won't let me get on that site :(   After researching it, it appears it's coming from the site host (Blogspot), NOT necessarily the blog poster (you).

All of our computers use Avast Security software and it flagged me from going to that site many times on each computer, saying that "JS:Agent-BDA[Trj]" is present there.  I searched that JS Agent (JavaScript Agent) and found the following info at

http://www.securelist.com/en/descriptions/old295490

"Programs classified as Trojan-Downloader download and install new versions of malicious programs, including Trojans and AdWare, on victim computers. Once downloaded from the Internet, the programs are launched or included on a list of programs which will run automatically when the operating system boots up.  Information about the names and locations of the programs which are downloaded are in the Trojan code, or are downloaded by the Trojan from an Internet resource (usually a web page).  This type of malicious program is frequently used in the initial infection of visitors to websites which contain exploits." 

Then I (my wife, actually) went to another site to find out how the JS Agent is detected, and found a list of security softwares that DO and DO NOT detect this type of agent.... for example, AVG and MacAfee DO NOT detect it, whereas Avast, BitDefender and NANO-Antivirus DO detect it.  You can see that information here:

https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/75ce87734af93e44a9a179d573a8c35569c3467b59a292e585add6b970cb625a/analysis/

This site also gives the file name for the JS-Agent, which is "output.9695474.txt"

I'm not a computer expert at all, but I asked my wife (who knows a thing or two about these things) to investigate it and this is what she and I found.  Again, I don't think anyone on this site is intentionally hacking computers or trying to cause problems....  I just wanted to share what I found.  

Anyway, I hope this is useful information to you :)

P.S.  Just noted that when my reply got posted, the above copied URL address has a space in it between the "585" and "add"...  so when you click on it it won't take you to the site.  So copy and paste it in your address bar and then remove the space...  sorry, don't know why it posted that way!!