Topics

What Kind of Camera do You Use?

I see so many great pictures that have been taken by so many talented forum members. Every now and then I get a half way decent one myself. But most don't compare to what I see others doing.

So, if you don't mind sharing, what kind of camera does everyone use? Maybe we could also use this thread to share a little on techniques, props, scale items, background material, lighting, etc.

One reason for my starting this is I have a new camera that I'm not real happy with. It's pretty basic compared to what's available out there. We picked it up in the electronics department at Wally-World recently. It's a Fujifilm Finepix AX. It has 16 mega pixel capability with a 5 X zoom lens.

We had an old Kodak Easy Share DX 7440 with just 4 mega pix. I felt that it took much better quality pics than the new one. It was also easier to use IMO.

So please share away. If you have suggestions for a camera type that everyone simply "must have", then feel free to share the joy :-) .

This should be interesting............  

I have a cannon power shot with a macro feature.  BUT, I use my smart phone.....
Go figure!
Suzi

I take some of my pics with my samsung galaxy s2 phone 8 mega pixel
I also use a samsung WB150F 14.2 mega pixel with 18x zoom with a Schneider Kreuznach lense its also wifi capable witch is a great feature it uploads to a variety of different places when in wifi area.

i was using my cell phone camera on my android until my wifes dog chewed it up. now i am camraless until next month.

I have Panasonic GH2. But most of the time I find it easier just to pull my Galaxy s3 out of the pocket for instant pictures.

Hey Bill, I use a Nikon D70. It's a digital SLR from 2004. The camera body is a bit old now but it isn't really the camera that makes great photos -- it's the lenses. I have beat the snot out of this think and it's been lugged around 30+ countries. It's spent months in the jungle as well as months in the desert. It's a great camera. I've taken over 40,000 images with it. 12,000 of which I've kept. The problem is the investment is pretty high for casual use. In 2004 this camera, a flash and 3 lenses set me back over 4 grand. To me it's been money well spent, but I'm not sure how much help that is to you.

I haven't done a lot of camera shopping lately so I can't really comment there. I may not be helping at all - sorry.

No, Micheal this is  great info! I doubt I'll ever spend 4 grand on a camera but it's great that you shared this. I really like hearing what others are using.

I just have to say this. 30+ countries? Jungles? Deserts? What the........!?! What are you dude, a Nat Geo photographer or something!? LOL! You've done the kind of traveling that most folks only dream about. Sounds like you should start a dedicated thread on your adventures ;) .

The pics you see from me are mostly from my phone, but I have a Canon T1i DSLR that takes great pictures.
A tip for anyone taking zoomed in photos...if they're blurry, stand back and then zoom in, rather than putting the lens up close to the object.  You're less likely to get a blurry photo this way.  This works great on pocket cameras.

Older Canon Power Shot S500, 5 mega pixels. Recently upgraded my cell phone to an Iphone and was told it will take better pictures than my Canon.

iPhone 5, my iPad, and if all else... iPhone 4s

MAC rules- sorry. My pictures turn out sooooo awesome.

Bill,
I have been lucky and have been able to travel quite a bit. But my adventures have not come without cost. If I ever get my photos organized and do more then a few calendars I will set up a web site, but unfortunately I'm years behind.

bill, 

i used to use my cell phone. but the pix were not what i wanted. it was a cheap cell phone. now i use my old camera cannon powershot SD1000 elph. it's not great, but it does the job. when i hit a jackpot, i'll go for digital SLR. i had my father's old nikon af1. my sister took that one since the film camera actually takes better picture. 

I guess you could call me a novice photographer. I have a Nikon D5000. It's a good intro DSLR beginner's camera. 
My go-to lens is usually my 50mm prime lens. I also have an 18-200mm lens for every-day photography.

But with point and shoot cameras that are less expensive, you can't go wrong with a Canon Powershot.

^ that's an awesome pic Nichole.  Our dogs would never sit that still for the camera!

A very good topic - I like the picture that Nicole posted - very nice.

Photos are a very important part of this forum for conveying the essence of our interests.   Photos showing the fruit, insides of the fruit, leaves, our set ups and figs in the outdoor environment are all fun to share and are informative on different levels. 

 
We all may be faced with various limitations which include limitations of our camera equipment, or skill level challenges.   Despite the limitations, I am very appreciative of much of what is shared via the photographs that are loaded on the forum.  I will however, outline a few aspects that I think are important and some possible solutions.
 
 I have been involved with photography most of my life and love to take photos.    I use a Canon D5 and love having complete manual control over every aspect of what I can control.    For me, the lack of some manual control makes getting the photo I am trying to make very difficult.  I think that there are common shared frustrations with the automatic cameras that might include difficulty getting the subject in focus and occasional color balance issues.
 
Focus -   There was a time when we may have had more control with this aspect of photography, but with the newer point and shoot cameras it can be a challenge focussing on smaller objects that are not part of the larger scene or focussing on something close up because of macro limitations of the equipment.    Sometimes there might be menu options in the small cameras that allow for close up photos.   Another option would be to take a photo further away and then crop it.
    Focus is also affected by the shutter speed.   If you are in a low light situation, your camera will adjust the speed and if you are not holding the camera still, it will be fuzzy.   A tripod is one solution or brace yourself against a solid object.
    Lastly, focus is a matter of the depth of field which is related to the aperture opening.    A smaller aperture opening gives us a greater depth of field meaning that distance points of a greater degree of separation from one another will be in focus.   When taking a photo in low light, the shutter speed is slower and the aperture will be more open.   A wide open aperture results in a very narrow depth of field.      
    With close up (macrophotography), depth of field is even more limited, making it more challenging for example, to have an entire fig fruit in focus.   There are ways around this...
 
Color balance & lighting - For most folks this is an elusive concept, one we really don't concern ourselves with.   However, we do certainly notice when our photo's color doesn't look right.   This of course can be an issue if we are trying to truly convey the color of the fruit.    All of the digital cameras adjust the color balance automatically and not all have ways to control it manually.    Auto balance systems I think, look for something "white" in the scene and try to balance the color temp based on that.    They don't always get it right.   
   Your camera may have some color balance options that include automatic, daylight, cloudy, shade, tungsten & fluorescent light.    Some more advanced cameras may have the option for you to use a grey card and customize the color balance.   Another option is to adjust the color balance using a program like Photoshop, but that starts adding more complexity.
  Other solutions might include:
 
a)  Taking a photo in good bright diffuse light.  Diffused light is best to avoid a contrasty picture.   A bright cloudy day might work well or taken in bright shade so that the light is diffuse (evenly bathing the subject in light).  A piece of "bright white" paper in a corner of the photo may be beneficial for the more automated cameras to calculate the correct color balance - perhaps others could share some knowledge about this. 
 
b)  Using your flash option - usually it is balance properly so that "white" is actually white and that the colors come out correctly.   There is however, a chance of creating unwanted shadows.
 
Exposure - Usually automatic mode might be adequate but sometimes it can be fooled.   If you are taking a photo of a dark fig on a dark background, the camera may overcompensate by overexposing the picture.     The opposite issue might occur if you are taking a photo of a light colored fig on a very light/bright background.   The camera will underexpose the photo.    If manual override is not an option, one solution might be to use a neutral background.  
 
Composition    -  Sometimes I think we have a good natural ability to frame photos well.   I think that it also can take some time to understand this concept and do it well.    
 
   Related to composition are the use of available backgrounds or backdrops to enhance the subject.     Jon does this with most of his fig fruit photos, using a dark background or using a photo program to complete the process.    Jon talked about this in a posting a long while back. 
 
So these are just some quick comments and thoughts.   Hopefully some of this will be useful - I could write much more but wanted to keep this at a reasonable length.   Perhaps others will elaborate or add some additional useful techniques.   I think it would also be very useful to know which smaller cameras are capable of taking extraordinary fig photos.
 
Ingevald
 

I concur with Ingevald, I want a Canon D5, but my budget allowed me a Canon Rebel.  Which frankly, I'm pretty darned happy with.  I do a fair amount of macro work in the garden with it, and it has served me very well.  Like Jennifer, I do use my 50 prime lens a fair amount in the garden, too, if I'm not looking for that super close up image (got taught with a 50 prime way back in my high school years, my dad was a professional photographer for a while), as well as my very trusty 70-300mm telephoto with image stablization.  My standard lens that sits on my camera body for the most part is my 17-85, also with image stabilizatoin, as I am often photographing wildlife (15-85 lens).  If I'm shooting birds of prey (have a lot of opportunity out above my backyard), I'll switch over to the 70-300mm lesn.  They are great, great lens.  Now, if I'm just running out to snap a quick pic of my figs, I grab my iPhone 5, which has a great built in camera.  It is actually one of the best built in phone camers around, believe it or not!

Now this is what I'm talking about! Great info that will be very useful to all of us. Many thanks to everyone for chiming in! 

I haven't read every recent post yet but just wanted to comment on that shot Nichole. Very nicely done! Cute looking dog you have there. If that puppy is a fig eater you could name that picture "Fig In Peril" or some such.

I want to talk more but my kids are having a snow day today. So, they have me a little tied up. Not getting much of my regular work done either. Guess it's just a day off for dad also :-/ . Fun time with the kids anyway :) .

That was indeed a fig in peril. My pups love all fruits and veggies. This next summer I will need to protect the fruit as it ripens.

Ingevald,
Great post. I love the D5 and if I weren't so invested in Nikon lenses I might make it my next camera. I had a hard time going digital as I loved the whole manual thing and developing my own stuff. Bygone days. 

One of the reasons -- actually the main reason -- I stayed with Nikon when I went digital was the 17=35 lens. At the time everyone was just raving about it. It's a big heavy lens, but between that lens, my macro and a 300mm telephoto I'm covered.

I shoot a lot of insects and these days the pros shoot at least 5 shots of say a bee then splice them together to get the darn thing in focus. The whole depth of field issue in macro is getting extremely software dependent. It used to be you made sure the eyes were in focus and everyone forgave the rest. 

You posted excellent advise. Thanks Ingevald.

Nichole -- nice shot.

19 posts and the fruit cakes haven't signed on yet. Is that a record?

Bill, I use my Iphone and "Snapbucket."

I have an Olympus 590uz but the company had a major scandal since I bought it so I don't know if I still would. It has a good macro, focal distance was the shortest in it's class at the time.

Wow! Now I'm really wishing I had started this thread before I bought my camera. Momma always saayd I always wuz a day late and a dollar short. Dad-gum!

Anyway. A lot of good info there Ingevald (and everyone else). I was once very interested in photography. When I was about 20 yrs old I bought two old cameras from a buddy of mine. An Argus C3 and a decent old Vivatar SLR. I know, some of you are saying "what'd he say?"

An Argus C3 was an old 35mm camera from the 50's. It looked like a box and had some sort of split image viewfinder that you used for focusing. It was an antique even 30 years ago. But I loved that old camera and I took some of the coolest shots with it. I somehow managed to lose it in a move one time. Bummer!

The Vivatar was a little more user friendly and versatile. I took hundreds of photographs with it. I think I still have most of that camera around here somewhere.

I also remember picking up this little Kodak book on basic photography at a drug store. It was amazing how much I learned from that one little book. How to use various speed films, shutter speeds, depth of field, lighting, etc. I was really in to it all there for awhile.  

There's a lot to be said about digital but there were some "other" things you could do with 35mm photography that can't be done quite the same way with digital - as far I know anyway.

Bill - love this thread!!!

My first digital camera was a Christmas gift from my parents.  I never wanted one "I am a purist with photos!  I need film!!  I need to focus and change whatever!  blah blah blah !" .  it was an  OlympusD-555zoom 5megapixel  w/ imagelink - it came with a printer you could hook the camera up to and print without using a computer - (still have it even though it no longer works :(!  ) I never printed with it.  I Loved it!!!!  I got it in 2005 and used it a lot.  I worked for a specialty cake / wedding cake bakery and would take pictures of the cakes I did and delivered. 

Then it died - very sad day indeed.  I wanted another Olympus so I wouldn't have such a steep learning curve for a new camera - couldn't find one quickly in my price range in my area.  So I went to a pawn shop, they had 1 Olympus! It was $55!! Didn't even have to  think about it - bought it right then and there. This was in 2010 - It's a FE-310 8megapixel.  It was a bit more camera then the last one, but I learned how to use it and my photos did get better.  It died 2 months ago -

A local camera store chain was closing and liquidating so I called several of them to see if they had any cameras left. One store about 20miles away still had a selection of more then 2.  They didn't have any Olympus - darn!!  so I bought a Sony Cyber-shot.  I am not in love with it - yet.  I think it has 14 megapixels, does video with sound, panorama shots, and other stuff I really don't know.  It is so hard to learn the new program on a camera - drives me crazy.  The macro telephoto is different then the Olympus and I can't figure out how to get a real good close up without being 4" away!! LOL

It just takes practice - practice makes better!

    Attached Images

  • Click image for larger version - Name: DSC00569a.jpg, Views: 33, Size: 589127

Nichole, your pictures are simply amazing.  Do you do much editing from the raw photo to get them so crisp and colorful?

I really like your 'dog & fig' pic, nichole. So well-taken. You have posted a 'before' pic, do you have the 'after' pic, you know with the fig gone and the dog smacking his lips.

Load More Posts... 31 remaining topics of 56 total
Reply Cancel
Subscribe Share Cancel