How can a seller be sure of what they are selling,
when they have never actually grown out what is being sold
and just trading and reselling what was acquired from others only recently ?

---------------------------------

Jon,  I have all the photos that were taken by the owners over the years.
There are over 1000 photos, many are labled on the back.
So, quite possibly I have pictures of many of those varieties.
I've only taken a casual glance at the photos, not enough time to catalog them.
I also have the sales records, so I know where many went as well,
probably most are long gone by today.
I know one of the biggest BC collections that existed, essentially 100% complete,
it all perished in a severe cold event a few years ago, only 4 or 5 trees survived.

While I applaud the thought, I don't know an un-enforceable rule set would matter. Those that care will always try their best to represent, and the small number that chooses to deceive will do so anyway. What I would like to see stopped is the labeling of unknowns without a UNK or unknown in the tittle. In my book except in a few instances once an unknown always an unknown. I really don’t care whether it’s someone like Jon or Vasille at a high level of knowledge or my ignorant self stating what they think it might be. Unless the origin of the plant later shows identify it should always remain an unknown. I have seen folks ask for an opinion and then label that plant. One classic example is someone asking about a plant that was labeled wrong from a nursery, and somewhere along the way VDB was speculated. That nursery has never carried VDB, but that member seems very proud of that fig and seems to have distributed it around. Maybe a good fig, but should have never carried a label without a UNK in the name to me.   Many of you will disagree and state that’s how we end up with so many names for the same fig and that bothers me as well and I understand but I would rather try to maintain a list of or very similar figs that likely are the same.

I have shared cuttings prior to ever having the plant fruit. Maybe I need to re-think that, but I do like to share with others and often there are cuttings available before fruiting. I do have records  where I obtained each plant, and provide that info when I share material, but that might get more complicated when I have sourced a cultivar from more than one source.  To this point I have never charged for any plant material be it fig or anything else, and I doubt I ever will as this is hobby for me and then it becomes more business, but I will never say never and sure don’t object paying for things or those that do profit or at least try to break even. I appreciate the effort some folks have went to make new cultivars available. One of my worst fears is finding I have distributed something wrongly labeled even if I gifted the material.

Essentially you have accepted all your stock at face value,
since you haven't verified anything by growing it out for a few years.
The same stock you are now trading and selling.

You don't see this as potentially compounding the problem ?
Assuming you are the most honest person in the world,
that does not matter,
as you have not vetted what you are growing, but distributing anyway.