@ Luke: Well, I'm sure glad I did a comparative taste test of Euston Fig before I wasted a load of time & resources on those cuttings. I, the missus, and some friends down the road shared the ripest sample I found (pics to follow later) - so we each had a qtr Euston Fig, which was more than enough to judge it reliably. I pitched it in a 'blind test' (ie only I knew the ID of the figs) against 2 of my best - Zailata (Gk Yellow) and TbF (prov. ID'd as a Lampeira Preta, San Pedro Cultivar).
[My Vasiliko Mavro has put all its energy into throwing sky high shoots, so only small green fruit so far. It will need some drastic pruning this winter to bring it back into line, and hopefully yield some ripe fruit within the next 2 seasons. But I digress, as usual]
Back to topic. We marked each fig out of 10. Except for minor differences in the scoring (as you might expect), we all agreed, so more or less unanimous. Both of my figs showed Euston Fig a clean pair of heels, coming out well ahead on the score board, with the Zailata slightly ahead of the Lampeira. Even my Italian Purple is streets ahead, and that's not even my best fig. I guess the moral of the story is: never judge a fig by its skin. Taste is king, and while Chelsea Fig may look more boring, it may well turn out to be the better of the two.
I sure hope so, coz if Euston Fig is typical of public fayre, I'm not sure I can cope with another disappointment on that scale. EF was just plain bland, nondescript, and severely lacking in any discernible levels of sweetness. One of our friends even wondered if it was a fully ripe sample, and as soon as the missus tasted it, she couldn't help letting slip some audible contempt for what she had just put in her mouth - it was that bad. All of which is quite surprising considering the glowing description in the link you originally sent me.
So no, I won't be wasting any time or space on this one. Sorry it wasn't better news mate. Maybe Chelsea Fig will restore the honour of ficus publicus.