Originally Posted by
binbin9I guess you can call me one of those passionate about keeping the naming of discovered figs in check. Its fine to call an known fig
"xyz" unknown but if I or anyone finds a tree that is a clearly a celeste, or any other
identifiable variety, I think it will muddle things to rename it and perpetuate further confusion.
To be honest even the
"Olympian" discovered here is probably an existing variety related to others in the old world. The DNA testing is not fool proof because the the DNA of it can only be compared to what they have in their database. I'm sure they do not have a complete DB of existing figs to compare it to.
There should be steps taken to IDing figs before giving it a NEW name. It's quite possible Justin has discovered a new fig but the chances are quite low and in my eyes it looks like a celeste.
Care should be taken to compare unknowns to a known variety. Do the leaves look the same? Do the figs look the same? Do they ripen at the same time as an existing variety within your climate?
Now climate has a lot to do with how figs will grow and ripen, so someone in California who has the same fig as me may have different texture leaves or even slightly different fig color than someone like myself in Seattle.
____
Here are the reasons why I'm passionate about this subject.
The brunswick has about over 20 synonyms associated to it. These are the names that have been associated with the fig throughout the decades.
IE: Brunswick = 1. Dalmation, 2. Dalmatia, 3. Clementine, 4. Vashon Violet, 5. Magnolia, 6. Black 7. Naples, 8. Black Triana, 9. Brunswig, 10. Castle Kennedy, 11. Broad White Turkey, 12. Madonna, 13. Khurtmani, 14. Bayswater, 15. Brown Hamburgh, 16. Clare, 17 De Saint Jean, 18. Hanover 19. Belle Dame, 20. Baidi 21. Belle Dame Blanche 22. Col Di Signon 23. DorAnother example is Kadota
![[57_zps1fzmonih]](https://i189.photobucket.com/albums/z195/ManFriend99/Mobile%20Uploads/2016-02/2016-02-14%2012.09.57_zps1fzmonih.jpg)
I have a couple problems with this ongoing practice of "Naming Figs" without trying to at first verify it's ID.
1. Confusion:
Unless you've done your home work, navigating all the figs that are put on sale on forums and ebay can be daunting. Fights have broken out over naming conventions and friendships have been broken up over these matters. I've stayed away from the forums lately because every week there seems to be some sort of drama that breaks out that causes members to quite. It's quit sad really. Figs are fun and not suppose to be a source of stress.
2. Money
My biggest complaint is that it's misleading to new hobbyist and one can spend thousands of dollars to grow their collection only to realize that when they finally fruit, that they have 5 of the same plant. IE "This guy" Pointing my thumbs to my chest.
But in this case knowledge is power and so there are a few of those that know of the many names that take advantage of this and sell the same variety under different names to make more money.
I recall going to Portland nursery and bought 2 figs. Oregon Prolific and King Fig. The Oregon Prolific turned out to be Marseilles which I already had 3 plants of. The king fig I'm still trying to figure out.
I hope I'm not alone in this thinking. Just trying to lessen the confusion and save folks $$ by not buying multiples of the same fig.
Feel free to google "Celeste Fig"
and see how many of those photos resemble the one that Justin has.
Justin this is not an attack on you just speaking my mind about a topic I'm passionate about.